5 Zooplankton Indices

Description: Model-based abundance and annual center of gravity indices for zooplankton groups sampled by NEFSC surveys

Indicator family:

Contributor(s): Sarah Gaichas and Harvey Walsh

Affiliations: NEFSC

5.1 Introduction to Indicator

Zooplankton are primary consumers in marine ecosystems that transfer energy from phytoplankton to fish, marine mammals, and birds. The Northeast Fisheries Science Center has conducted zooplankton surveys since the 1970s. Spatially explicit indices of abundance for several zooplankton groups were estimated using spatio-temporal modeling (VAST, [10]; [11]).

The zooplankton groups in the model include:

Copepods

  • Calanus finmarchicus, = Single species group, used to represent large copepods in the small-large index)

  • Large copepods ALL: Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia lucens, Calanus minor, Eucalanus spp., Calanus spp.

  • Small copepods ALL: Centropages typicus, Pseudocalanus spp., T_emora longicornis_, Centropages hamatus, Paracalanus parvus, Acartia spp., Clausocalanus arcuicornis, Acartia longiremis, Clausocalanus furcatus, Temora stylifera, Temora spp., Tortanus discaudatus, Paracalanus spp.

  • Small copeopods SOE (used to represent small copepods in the small-large index): Centropages typicus, Pseudocalanus spp., Temora longicornis, Centropages hamatus

Euphausiids (krill) modeled as family level group; not differentiated to species in data

Zooplankton volume a metric of total zooplankton; all groups combined displacement volume in the collection net

5.2 Key Results and Visualizations

Abundance Large and small copepod groups are mainly fluctuating without trend in both spring and fall across the EPUs. However, a significant long term decrease in small copepods was apparent in the MAB during fall, and a recent decrease during spring. Similarly, zooplankton volume is fluctuating without long term trends over time. A recent significant decline was detected for Spring zooplankton volume in the MAB.

Euphausiids, in contrast, show increasing trends over time in all regions during fall, and in the MAB during spring. In addition, a significant recent increase was detected in the GOM in Fall.

Center of Gravity Small copepods in fall are trending northeast similar to forage fish and aggregated survey species. Small copepods in spring are trending north. Large copepods in fall are trending west, similar to benthos. No significant change for Calfin, Euphausiids, or Zooplankton volume center of gravity over time.

5.2.1 MidAtlantic

5.2.2 NewEngland

5.3 Indicator statistics

Spatial scale: by EPU and full shelf

Temporal scale: Spring (January-June), Fall (July-December)

Synthesis Theme:

5.4 Implications

Fluctuations in zooplankton community composition can affect both the consumption of phytoplankton vs the export of energy to the benthos, as well as the availability of prey for zooplankton feeding forage fish, marine mammals, and seabirds.

The relative dominance of large and small copepods in Northeast US ecosystems has been liked to changes in fish productivity [12,Morse2017?].

Distribution shifts for zooplankton may result in mismatches with zooplankton feeding fish, marine mammal, and seabirds.

5.5 Get the data

Point of contact:

ecodata name: ecodata::zooplankton_index

Variable definitions

Naming key * Calanus finmarchicus (calfin_100m3) = “calfin” , * Large copepods (calfin_100m3, mlucens_100m3, calminor_100m3, euc_100m3, calspp_100m3) = “lgcopeALL”, * Small copepods (all) (ctyp_100m3, pseudo_100m3, tlong_100m3, cham_100m3, para_100m3, acarspp_100m3, clauso, acarlong_100m3, fur_100m3, ost_100m3, temspp_100m3, tort_100m3, paraspp_100m3) = “smallcopeALL” and * Small copepods (SOE) (ctyp_100m3, pseudo_100m3, tlong_100m3, cham_100m3) = “smallcopeSOE”.

Indicator Category:

5.6 Public Availability

Source data are NOT publicly available.

5.7 Accessibility and Constraints

Request from Harvey Walsh,

tech-doc link https://noaa-edab.github.io/tech-doc/zooplankton_index.html

References

10.
Thorson JT, Barnett LAK. Comparing estimates of abundance trends and distribution shifts using single- and multispecies models of fishes and biogenic habitat. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2017;74: 1311–1321. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw193
11.
Thorson JT. Guidance for decisions using the Vector Autoregressive Spatio-Temporal (VAST) package in stock, ecosystem, habitat and climate assessments. Fisheries Research. 2019;210: 143–161. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.013
12.
Perretti C, Fogarty M, Friedland K, Hare J, Lucey S, McBride R, et al. Regime shifts in fish recruitment on the Northeast US Continental Shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2017;574: 1–11. doi:10.3354/meps12183