5 Zooplankton Indices

Last updated July 23, 2026

Description: Model-based abundance and annual center of gravity indices for zooplankton groups sampled by NEFSC surveys

Contributor(s): Abigail Tyrell, Sarah Gaichas, Harvey Walsh

Affiliations: NEFSC

Indicator Family:

Indicator Category:

Synthesis Theme:

5.1 Introduction to Indicator

Zooplankton are primary consumers in marine ecosystems that transfer energy from phytoplankton to fish, marine mammals, and birds. The Northeast Fisheries Science Center has conducted zooplankton surveys since the 1970s. Spatially explicit indices of abundance for several zooplankton groups were estimated using spatio-temporal modeling (VAST, [12]; [13]).

The zooplankton groups in the model include:

Copepods

  • Calanus finmarchicus, = Single species group, used to represent large copepods in the small-large index)

  • Large copepods ALL: Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia lucens, Calanus minor, Eucalanus spp., Calanus spp.

  • Small copepods ALL: Centropages typicus, Pseudocalanus spp., T_emora longicornis_, Centropages hamatus, Paracalanus parvus, Acartia spp., Clausocalanus arcuicornis, Acartia longiremis, Clausocalanus furcatus, Temora stylifera, Temora spp., Tortanus discaudatus, Paracalanus spp.

  • Small copeopods SOE (used to represent small copepods in the small-large index): Centropages typicus, Pseudocalanus spp., Temora longicornis, Centropages hamatus

Euphausiids (krill) modeled as family level group; not differentiated to species in data

Zooplankton volume a metric of total zooplankton; all groups combined displacement volume in the collection net

5.2 Key Results and Visualizations

Abundance Large and small copepod groups are mainly fluctuating without trend in both spring and fall across the EPUs. Large copepod biomass has a short-term decline in the spring in both the GOM and GB. Small copepods have a long-term decline in the MAB in fall, and a long-term increase in the GOM in the spring. Euphausiid show increasing trends over time in all regions during fall. Zooplankton volume is fluctuating without long term trends over time.

Center of Gravity Small copepods in fall are trending northeast similar to forage fish and aggregated survey species. Small copepods in spring are trending north. There is a short-term westward trend for Calanus finmarchicus in the spring. There has been no other significant change for Calanus finmarchicus, large copepods, euphausiids, or zooplankton volume center of gravity over time.

Mid-Atlantic, Calfin, index


New England, Calfin, index


Mid-Atlantic, Euph, index


New England, Euph, index


Mid-Atlantic, Smallcopesoe, index


New England, Smallcopesoe, index


Mid-Atlantic, Lgcopeall, index


New England, Lgcopeall, index


Mid-Atlantic, Zoopvol, index


New England, Zoopvol, index


Mid-Atlantic, Smallcopeall, index


New England, Smallcopeall, index


Mid-Atlantic, Calfin, cog


New England, Calfin, cog


Mid-Atlantic, Euph, cog


New England, Euph, cog


Mid-Atlantic, Smallcopesoe, cog


New England, Smallcopesoe, cog


Mid-Atlantic, Lgcopeall, cog


New England, Lgcopeall, cog


Mid-Atlantic, Zoopvol, cog


New England, Zoopvol, cog


Mid-Atlantic, Smallcopeall, cog


New England, Smallcopeall, cog


5.3 Implications

Fluctuations in zooplankton community composition can affect both the consumption of phytoplankton vs the export of energy to the benthos, as well as the availability of prey for zooplankton feeding forage fish, marine mammals, and seabirds.

The relative dominance of large and small copepods in Northeast US ecosystems has been liked to changes in fish productivity [14].

Distribution shifts for zooplankton may result in mismatches with zooplankton feeding fish, marine mammal, and seabirds.

5.4 Indicator statistics

Spatial scale: by EPU and full shelf

Temporal scale: Spring (January-June), Fall (July-December)

Variable definitions

5.5 Get the data

Point of contact: EDAB,

ecodata dataset: ecodata::zooplankton_index

Tech Doc link: https://noaa-edab.github.io/tech-doc/zooplankton_index.html

5.5.1 Public Availability

Source data are NOT publicly available.

5.5.2 Accessibility Constraints

Request from Harvey Walsh,

References

12.
Thorson JT, Barnett LAK. Comparing estimates of abundance trends and distribution shifts using single- and multispecies models of fishes and biogenic habitat. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2017;74: 1311–1321. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsw193
13.
Thorson JT. Guidance for decisions using the Vector Autoregressive Spatio-Temporal (VAST) package in stock, ecosystem, habitat and climate assessments. Fisheries Research. 2019;210: 143–161. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.013
14.
Perretti C, Fogarty M, Friedland K, Hare J, Lucey S, McBride R, et al. Regime shifts in fish recruitment on the Northeast US Continental Shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2017;574: 1–11. doi:10.3354/meps12183