14 Survey Impacts from Offshore Wind Development

Description: Offshore wind development is expected to have several impacts on federal and state surveys.

Indicator family:

Contributor(s): Douglas Christel

Affiliations: GARFO

14.1 Introduction to Indicator

Proceed as though this were a short summary of a typical introduction section in a paper.

14.2 Key Results and Visualizations

Proceed as though this were a short summary of a typical results section in a paper.

14.3 Indicator statistics

Spatial scale: full shelf

Temporal scale: Decadal

Synthesis Theme:

14.4 Implications

Proposed wind development areas interact with the region’s federal scientific surveys [28]. Scientific surveys are impacted by offshore wind in four ways: 1) Exclusion of NOAA Fisheries’ sampling platforms from the wind development area due to operational and safety limitations; 2) Impacts on the random-stratified statistical design that is the basis for scientific assessments, advice, and analyses; 3) Alteration of benthic and pelagic habitats, and airspace in and around the wind energy development, requiring new designs and methods to sample new habitats; and, 4) Reduced sampling productivity through navigation impacts of wind energy infrastructure on aerial and vessel survey operations.

Increased vessel transit between stations may decrease data collections that are already limited by annual days-at-sea day allocations. The total survey area overlap ranges from 1-70% for all Greater Atlantic federal surveys. The Gulf of Maine Cooperative Research Bottom Longline Survey (41%) and the Shrimp Survey (70%) have the largest percent overlap with the draft Gulf of Maine Wind Energy Areas. The remaining surveys range from 1-16% overlap. Individual survey strata have significant interaction with wind, including the sea scallop survey (up to 96% of individual strata) and the bottom trawl survey (BTS, up to 60% strata overlap). Additionally, up to 50% of the southern New England North Atlantic right whale survey’s area overlaps with proposed project areas and a region-wide survey mitigation program is underway [29]

14.5 Get the data

Point of contact:

ecodata name: No dataset

Variable definitions

No Data

No Data

Indicator Category:

14.6 Public Availability

Source data are publicly available.

14.7 Accessibility and Constraints

No response

References

28.
Friedland KD, Boucher JM, Jones AW, Methratta ET, Morse RE, Foley C, et al. The spatial correlation between trawl surveys and planned wind energy infrastructure on the US Northeast Continental Shelf. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2023; fsad167. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsad167
29.
Northeast Fisheries Science Center (U.S.). Fall Management Track Assessments 2020. 2022; doi:10.25923/8N72-Q136