Processing math: 100%
+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
Notes for next slide

MAFMC SSC Ecosystem working group

Update
12 September 2023

Sarah Gaichas, Geret DePiper, and Brandon Muffley

1 / 14

Ecosystem work

  • SSC subgroup update

    • Paul and Brian's work (presented separately)
    • Walden and DePiper Index numbers paper published
    • Ecosystem Overfishing Indicator analysis
  • EAFM risk assessment update

    • EOP and AP meeting Sept 13-14
    • High level overview of new elements here

EAFM Policy Guidance Doc Word Cloud

2 / 14

Ecosystem Overfishing Indicators

Background:

Ryther index; total landings presented on a unit area basis for the MAB. Theoretical estimates (Link and Watson, 2019) imply the index should range from 0.3 - 1.1 mt per sq km annually (green area) with a limit of 3 mt per sq km annually, above which tipping points could occur in fished ecosystems (orange area). Expected system-wide MSYs can be in the range of 1 to 3 mt per sq km (unshaded).

Ryther index; total landings presented on a unit area basis for the MAB. Theoretical estimates (Link and Watson, 2019) imply the index should range from 0.3 - 1.1 mt per sq km annually (green area) with a limit of 3 mt per sq km annually, above which tipping points could occur in fished ecosystems (orange area). Expected system-wide MSYs can be in the range of 1 to 3 mt per sq km (unshaded).

3 / 14

Ongoing analysis

Baseline primary production

  • Calculated regional estimates of C using similar approach (average TL, TE)

Use species trophic level information

  • Contrast with species specific trophic level information (from fishbase)
  • Calculate a system wide "average" trophic level, TLa, using the idea that primary production required to support the total catch is equal to the sum of primary production required for each species catch

    ni=1Ci(1TE)TLi1=(ni=1Ci)1TETLa1

4 / 14

Proposed Analysis

Simulation study (Atlantis ecosystem model)

  • Calculate thresholds using model input/outputs
    • PP input data
    • Trophic level estimated from realized diets
    • Realized catch
  • Create scenarios which include additional fishing pressure
    • increase all species equally
    • target species with different pressures
  • Compare realized catch to the thresholds
  • Examine health of the system (extinct species?), changes in realized diets.
  • How robust are these threshold estimates?
  • Reliably indicate ecosystem overfishing?

Atlantis model: https://github.com/NOAA-EDAB/neus-atlantis/wiki

5 / 14
  • Defined prey inputs (pprey parameter values)
    • Realized diet output
    • System wide average trophic level

Ecosystem WG Discussion

  • Metrics to evaluate simulated ecosystem overfishing

    • Single species overfishing and overfished
    • Metrics applied in other studies (Fulton, ecosystem)
    • Metrics used in NEFMC pMSE
    • Metrics of system variability, Nyquist stability criterion
    • Evaluate impacts to species, functinal groups, fisheries, markets
  • If possible, evaluate the status of the ecosystem that implements current SSC ABC recommendations across all species (and other management bodies)

  • Tie in with EAFM Risk Assessment

6 / 14

EAFM Risk Assessment Review

Species level risk elements

Species Assess Fstatus Bstatus FW1Pred FW1Prey FW2Prey Climate DistShift EstHabitat
Ocean Quahog lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest highest modhigh lowest
Surfclam lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest modhigh modhigh lowest
Summer flounder lowest lowest lowmod lowest lowest lowest lowmod modhigh highest
Scup lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest lowmod modhigh highest
Black sea bass lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest modhigh modhigh highest
Atl. mackerel lowest highest highest lowest lowest lowest lowmod modhigh lowest
Chub mackerel highest lowmod lowmod lowest lowest lowest na na lowest
Butterfish lowest lowest lowmod lowest lowest lowest lowest highest lowest
Longfin squid lowmod lowmod lowmod lowest lowest lowmod lowest modhigh lowest
Shortfin squid highest lowmod lowmod lowest lowest lowmod lowest highest lowest
Golden tilefish lowest lowest lowmod lowest lowest lowest modhigh lowest lowest
Blueline tilefish highest highest modhigh lowest lowest lowest modhigh lowest lowest
Bluefish lowest lowest lowmod lowest lowest lowest lowest modhigh highest
Spiny dogfish lowest highest lowmod lowest lowest lowest lowest highest lowest
Monkfish highest lowmod lowmod lowest lowest lowest lowest modhigh lowest
Unmanaged forage na na na lowest lowmod lowmod na na na
Deepsea corals na na na lowest lowest lowest na na na
  • RT assessment decreased Spiny dogfish Assess, risk to low and increased Fstatus risk to high
  • RT assessment decreased bluefish Bstatus risk from high to low-moderate
  • RT assessment increased Illex Assess risk from low-moderate to high

Ecosystem level risk elements

System EcoProd CommRev RecVal FishRes1 FishRes4 FleetDiv Social ComFood RecFood
Mid-Atlantic lowmod modhigh lowest lowest modhigh lowest lowmod highest modhigh
  • Recreational value risk decreased from low-moderate to low

Species and Sector level risk elements

Species MgtControl TecInteract OceanUse RegComplex Discards Allocation
Ocean Quahog-C lowest lowest lowmod lowest modhigh lowest
Surfclam-C lowest lowest lowmod lowest modhigh lowest
Summer flounder-R modhigh lowest lowmod modhigh highest highest
Summer flounder-C lowmod modhigh lowmod modhigh modhigh lowest
Scup-R lowmod lowest lowmod modhigh modhigh highest
Scup-C lowest lowmod modhigh modhigh modhigh lowest
Black sea bass-R highest lowest modhigh modhigh highest highest
Black sea bass-C highest lowmod highest modhigh highest lowest
Atl. mackerel-R lowmod lowest lowest lowmod lowest lowest
Atl. mackerel-C lowest lowmod modhigh highest lowmod highest
Butterfish-C lowest lowmod modhigh modhigh modhigh lowest
Longfin squid-C lowest modhigh highest modhigh highest lowest
Shortfin squid-C lowmod lowmod lowmod modhigh lowest highest
Golden tilefish-R na lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest
Golden tilefish-C lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest
Blueline tilefish-R lowmod lowest lowest lowmod lowest lowest
Blueline tilefish-C lowmod lowest lowest lowmod lowest lowest
Bluefish-R lowmod lowest lowest lowmod modhigh highest
Bluefish-C lowest lowest lowmod lowmod lowmod lowest
Spiny dogfish-R lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest lowest
Spiny dogfish-C lowest modhigh modhigh modhigh lowmod lowest
Chub mackerel-C lowest lowmod lowmod lowmod lowest lowest
Unmanaged forage lowest lowest modhigh lowest lowest lowest
Deepsea corals na na modhigh na na na
  • Management section not updated--to be revised this year
7 / 14

State of the Ecosystem → MAFMC Risk assessent example: Commercial revenue

This element is applied at the ecosystem level. Revenue serves as a proxy for commercial profits.

Risk Level Definition
Low No trend and low variability in revenue
Low-Moderate Increasing or high variability in revenue
Moderate-High Significant long term revenue decrease
High Significant recent decrease in revenue

Ranked moderate-high risk due to the significant long term revenue decrease

Key: Black = Revenue of all species combined; Red = Revenue of MAFMC managed species

8 / 14

State of the Ecosystem → MAFMC Risk assessent example: Commercial revenue

This element is applied at the ecosystem level. Revenue serves as a proxy for commercial profits.

Risk Level Definition
Low No trend and low variability in revenue
Low-Moderate Increasing or high variability in revenue
Moderate-High Significant long term revenue decrease
High Significant recent decrease in revenue

Ranked moderate-high risk due to the significant long term revenue decrease

Key: Black = Revenue of all species combined; Red = Revenue of MAFMC managed species

Risk element: CommRev, unchanged

SOE Implications: Recent change driven by benthos. Monitor changes in climate and landings drivers:

  • Climate risk element: Surfclams and ocean quahogs are sensitive to ocean warming and acidification.
  • pH in surfclam summer habitat is approaching, but not yet at, pH affecting surfclam growth
8 / 14

New elements under discussion

Ecological

  • Food web: prey availability
  • Food web: predation pressure
  • Population and ecological diversity
  • Offshore habitat
  • Invasive species

Economic and Social

  • Commercial fishery resilience (many)
  • Recreational diversity
  • Recreational resilience
  • Rec and commercial employment

Management

  • Other ocean activities

    • Split out offshore wind
      • Biological/ecological risks
      • Survey/fishery access risks
    • Add non-wind activities?
    • Add aquaculture?
  • Essential fish habitat

9 / 14

Next SSC update in March 2024!

10 / 14

Appendix: Ecosystem Overfishing Indicators

The amount of potential yield we can expect from a marine ecosystem depends on

  • The amount of production entering at the base of the food web, primarily in the form of phytoplankton
  • The pathways this energy follows to reach harvested species
  • The efficiency of transfer of energy at each step in the food web
  • The fraction of this production that is removed by the fisheries

Ryther, Fogarty, Friedland Indices

The Ryther index consists of total catch presented on a per unit-area basis for an ecosystem.

The Fogarty index is the ratio of total catches to total primary productivity in an ecosystem.

The Friedland index is the ratio of total catches to mean annual chlorophyll in an ecosystem.

From (Link, 2021) "One can develop and estimate thresholds for them based on first principles, trophic transfer theory, and empirical evidence." Thresholds were proposed (Link, et al., 2019)

11 / 14

Link and Watson 2019, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aav0474

All three indices are based on the principle of energy transfer up the foodweb from primary producers. There are limits to how much an ecosystem can produce and potentially be caught, C in tons year1

C=αPP.TETL1 where

PP = primary production ( tons C year1 )

TE = Transfer efficiency

TL = Trophic level

α is "a scalar for local conditions (set to 15% -20% for average availability of the TL in estimating total catch, a value that emerges when estimated from maintaining a global average catch that has been stable for the past 30 yrs)"

This equation is primary production required (PPR) rearranged to express Catch in terms of PP rather than PP in terms of Catch (at the system aggregate level)

12 / 14

Link and Watson 2019, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aav0474

C=αPP.TETL1

  • Range of values for α (10%-20%), TE (10%-14%), and TL(3.2-3.6), PP (40-50 Gt C year1) selected to bound the problem. The bounds help define the thresholds.
  • Range of estimated C = 0.1 to 1 Gt year1
  • Middle ground estimate of C = .42 Gt year1
    • using α = 0.15, TE = 12%, TL = 3.4, PP = 45Gt C year1
    • Carbon to wet weight conversion of 10
  • These help define the thresholds for all indices

13 / 14

Ecosystem overfishing (EOF) defined as:
an instance where the sum of all catches is flat or declining, total catch per unit effort (CPUE) is declining, and total landings relative to ecosystem production exceeds suitable limits.

Link and Watson 2019, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aav0474

Defined as total catch per unit area in the ecosystem (Link, et al., 2019). The units are mt km2year1

The upper bound of the optimal range, (using C = .42 Gtyear1) is calculated as:

Ryther = .42Gtyear1109363km2106 =1.16tkm2year1

where the worlds oceans are approximately 363 million km2

  • Assumes each km2 of ocean is equally productive

  • We'd like to estimate thresholds in a similar fashion but at a smaller spatial scale using regional estimates of PP and using knowledge of the ecosystem.

Link & Watson "recommend that the indices proposed here be used cognizant of other potential sources of productivity and that are relevant to the scale at which fisheries management mostly occurs."

14 / 14

Ecosystem overfishing (EOF) defined as:
an instance where the sum of all catches is flat or declining, total catch per unit effort (CPUE) is declining, and total landings relative to ecosystem production exceeds suitable limits.

Ecosystem work

  • SSC subgroup update

    • Paul and Brian's work (presented separately)
    • Walden and DePiper Index numbers paper published
    • Ecosystem Overfishing Indicator analysis
  • EAFM risk assessment update

    • EOP and AP meeting Sept 13-14
    • High level overview of new elements here

EAFM Policy Guidance Doc Word Cloud

2 / 14
Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
Esc Back to slideshow