Ecosystem indicators linked to management objectives (DePiper, et al., 2017)
Two annual reports evolving since 2016
Open science emphasis (Bastille, et al., 2020)
The IEA Loop1
Objective Categories | Indicators reported here |
---|---|
Provisioning and Cultural Services | |
Seafood Production | Landings; commercial total and by feeding guild; recreational harvest |
Profits | Revenue decomposed to price and volume |
Recreation | Days fished; recreational fleet diversity |
Stability | Diversity indices (fishery and ecosystem) |
Social & Cultural | Community engagement/reliance status |
Protected Species | Bycatch; population (adult and juvenile) numbers, mortalities |
Supporting and Regulating Services | |
Biomass | Biomass or abundance by feeding guild from surveys |
Productivity | Condition and recruitment of managed species, Primary productivity |
Trophic structure | Relative biomass of feeding guilds, Zooplankton |
Habitat | Estuarine and offshore habitat conditions |
Characterizing ecosystem change for fishery management
Spatial scale
A glossary of terms, detailed technical methods documentation and indicator data are available online.
Key to figures
Trends assessed only for 30+ years: more information
Orange line = significant increase
Purple line = significant decrease
No color line = not significant or < 30 yearsGrey background = last 10 years
Indicators: Commercial landings
Key: Black = Landings of all species combined;
Red = Landings of NEFMC managed species
Multiple drivers: ecosystem and stock production, management, market conditions (including COVID-19 disruptions), and environmental change
Indicators: Recreational harvest
*US Seafood Industry and For-Hire Sector Impacts from COVID-19: 2020 in Perspective
Indicators: Revenue and Bennet Index of Price and Volume
Key: Black = Revenue of all species combined;
Red = Revenue of NEFMC managed species
Indicators: Recreational effort and fleet diversity
Implications:
Decline in recreational fleet diversity suggests a potentially reduced range of opportunities.
Driven by party/charter contraction (from a high of 24% of angler trips to 7% currently), and a shift toward shore based angling.
Fishery Indicators: commercial species revenue diversity, recreational species catch diversity
Ecological Indicator: expected number of species, NEFSC bottom trawl survey
Implications:
Indicators: Environmental justice vulnerability, commercial fishery engagement and reliance
Implications: Highlighted communities may be vulnerable to changes in fishing patterns due to regulations and/or climate change. When also experiencing environmental justice issues, they may have lower ability to successfully respond to change.
Indicators: Harbor porpoise and gray seal bycatch
Implications:
Currently meeting objectives
The downward trend in harbor porpoise bycatch can also be due to a decrease in harbor porpoise abundance in US waters, reducing their overlap with fisheries, and a decrease in gillnet effort.
The increasing trend in gray seal bycatch may be related to an increase in the gray seal population.
Indicators: North Atlantic right whale population, calf counts
Implications:
Population drivers for North Atlantic Right Whales (NARW) include combined fishery interactions/ship strikes, distribution shifts, and copepod availability.
Additional potential stressors include offshore wind development, which overlaps with important habitat areas used year-round by right whales, including mother and calf migration corridors and foraging habitat.
Unusual mortality events continue for 3 large whale species.
Indicators: MAB surface and bottom temperature
Indicators: MAB marine heatwaves
Indicators: ocean currents
Indicator: warm core rings
Indicator: cold pool indices
Indicator: ocean acidifictaion
Implications: Changes in cold pool could have impacts on multiple managed species. Areas of lower pH are in known surfclam habitat.
Indicators: Chesapeake Bay temperature
Indicator: SAV trends in Chesapeake Bay
Indicator: water quality attainment
Indicators: chlorophyll, primary production, phytoplankton size class
Implications: increased production by smaller phytoplankton implies less efficient transfer of primary production to higher trophic levels.
Implications: fluctuating environmental conditions and prey for forage species affect both abundance and energy content. Energy content varies by season, and has changed over time most dramatically for Atlantic herring
Indicator: fish condition
Indicator: fish productivity anomaly
Implications: Most species in the MAB had below average or poor condition again in 2021. Preliminary results of synthetic analyses show that changes in temperature, zooplankton, fishing pressure, and population size influence the condition of different fish species.
Indicator: species distribution
Implications: Species as a whole moving could mean new species interactions and potential for fishers.
Indicators: predator status and trends
Implications: No trend in aggregate sharks and HMS populations mainly at or above taget. Stable predator populations suggest stable predation pressure on managed species, but increasing seal populations may reflect increasing predation pressure.
Indicators: climate sensitive species life stages mapped to climate vulnerable habitats
Indicators: development timeline, fishery and community specific revenue in lease areas
Implications:
Current plans for rapid buildout of offshore wind in a patchwork of areas spreads the impacts differentially throughout the region.
Development will affect species differently, negatively affecting species that prefer soft bottom habitat while potentially benefiting species that prefer hard structured habitat.
Up to 20% of annual commercial landings and revenue for Mid-Atlantic species occur in lease areas.
The New England and Mid-Atlantic SOEs made possible by (at least) 61 contributors from 14 institutions
Kimberly Bastille
Aaron Beaver (Anchor QEA)
Andy Beet
Ruth Boettcher (Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries)
Mandy Bromilow (NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office)
Zhuomin Chen (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
Joseph Caracappa
Doug Christel (GARFO)
Patricia Clay
Lisa Colburn
Jennifer Cudney (NMFS Atlantic HMS Management Division)
Tobey Curtis (NMFS Atlantic HMS Management Division)
Geret DePiper
Dan Dorfman (NOAA-NOS-NCCOS)
Emily Farr (NMFS Office of Habitat Conservation)
Michael Fogarty
Paula Fratantoni
Kevin Friedland
Marjy Friedrichs (VIMS)
Sarah Gaichas
Ben Galuardi (GARFO)
Avijit Gangopadhyay (School for Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth)
James Gartland (Virginia Institute of Marine Science)
Glen Gawarkiewicz (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
Sean Hardison
Kimberly Hyde
John Kosik
Steve Kress (National Audubon Society’s Seabird Restoration Program)
Young-Oh Kwon (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
Scott Large
Andrew Lipsky
Sean Lucey
Don Lyons (National Audubon Society’s Seabird Restoration Program)
Chris Melrose
Shannon Meseck
Ryan Morse
Brandon Muffley (MAFMC)
Kimberly Murray
Chris Orphanides
Richard Pace
Tom Parham (Maryland DNR)
Charles Perretti
CJ Pellerin (NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office)
Grace Roskar (NMFS Office of Habitat Conservation)
Grace Saba (Rutgers)
Vincent Saba
Chris Schillaci (GARFO)
Dave Secor (CBL)
Angela Silva
Adrienne Silver (UMass/SMAST)
Emily Slesinger (Rutgers University)
Laurel Smith
Talya tenBrink (GARFO)
Bruce Vogt (NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office)
Ron Vogel (UMD Cooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies and NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research)
John Walden
Harvey Walsh
Changhua Weng
Mark Wuenschel
Bastille, K. et al. (2020). "Improving the IEA Approach Using Principles of Open Data Science". In: Coastal Management 0.0. Publisher: Taylor & Francis _ eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846155, pp. 1-18. ISSN: 0892-0753. DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2021.1846155. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1846155 (visited on Dec. 09, 2020).
DePiper, G. S. et al. (2017). "Operationalizing integrated ecosystem assessments within a multidisciplinary team: lessons learned from a worked example". En. In: ICES Journal of Marine Science 74.8, pp. 2076-2086. ISSN: 1054-3139. DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx038. URL: https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/74/8/2076/3094701 (visited on Mar. 09, 2018).
Ecosystem indicators linked to management objectives (DePiper, et al., 2017)
Two annual reports evolving since 2016
Open science emphasis (Bastille, et al., 2020)
The IEA Loop1
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |