+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
Notes for next slide

Greece, Crete, near the cave of Polypheomos

Fragile ecosystems, robust assessments?

(What I did with my summer vacation)

Sarah Gaichas, Isaac Kaplan, Patrick Lynch, and Christine Stawitz
Northeast and Northwest Fisheries Science Centers,
and Office of Science & Technology


Supported by Institute of Marine Research Norway, and NOAA NMFS International Fellowship

1 / 41

Summer Vacation

2 / 41

Greece, Crete, near the cave of Polypheomos

Summer Vacation

3 / 41

Greece, Crete, near the cave of Polypheomos

Summer Vacation

4 / 41

Greece, Crete, near the cave of Polypheomos

Summer Vacation

cyclopscafe

cyclopshike

5 / 41

Greece, Crete, near the cave of Polypheomos

8 / 41

9 / 41

10 / 41

11 / 41

12 / 41

13 / 41

Hubris will sink you (or substantially delay achieving your objectives, and at great cost)

Things change; workarounds are important

testing is a theme (hypotheses, skills, each other)

Things we learn about Poseidon

  • Tricky: unforseen challenges

  • Vengeful: high cost of overconfidence

poseidon

14 / 41

Things we learn from Odysseus

  • Test your models

  • Guard your Personally Identifiable Information (PII)

odysseus

15 / 41

We use models for a lot

NOAAlogo NOAA fisheries

16 / 41

What kinds of models are there?

ecomods

17 / 41

How do we know they are right?

  • Fits to historical data (hindcast)

  • Influence of data over time (retrospective diagnostics)

  • Keep as simple and focused as possible

  • Simulation testing

But What if

data are noisy?

we need to model complex interactions?

conditions change over time?

18 / 41

Fragile ecosystems, robust assessments? Performance testing stock assessments for the California Current and Nordic and Barents Seas under climate change

  • Scientist exchange central to this project

  • NOAA internal "international fellowship" and REDUS funding:

    • Gaichas, April 15 - June 15
    • Lynch, April 18 - June 7
    • Kaplan, May 11 - June 21
    • Christine Stawitz, May 19-25

exchange:scale 250% 1

  • Additional NMFS and IMR collaborators with diverse skills and experiences
    • Kelli Johnson, Gavin Fay, Emma Hodgson, other stock assessment and modeling folks
    • Cecilie Hansen, Daniel Howell, Erik Olsen, and now YOU
19 / 41

Project motivation

  • Changing climate and ocean conditions → Shifting distributions, changing productivity

  • Needs:

    • Improve our ability to project global change impacts in the California Current and Nordic/Barents Seas (and elsewhere)
    • Test the performance of stock assessments to these impacts

Climate-Ready Management1 Climateready

[1] Karp, Melissa A. et al. 2019. Accounting for shifting distributionsand changing productivity in the development of scientific advice for fishery management. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz048.

20 / 41

End-to-end ecosystem operating models

Atlantis modeling framework: Fulton et al. 2011, Fulton and Smith 2004

Norwegian-Barents Sea

Hansen et al. 2016, 2018

NOBA scale 90%

Building on global change projections: Hodgson et al. 2018, Olsen et al. 2018

21 / 41

Project overview

  1. Scenarios for effects of temperature on growth, natural mortality

  2. Focus on key stocks (Northeast Arctic cod, Norwegian spring spawning herring, California Current sardine, Pacific hake or a Pacific rockfish)

  3. Atlantis output → dataset generator (atlantisom) → Stock Synthesis assessment

  4. Compare performance of different model settings, multiple models, model ensembles

Bonus: atlantisom → multispecies, other single species models for testing
22 / 41

Test both estimation and (simple) MSE capability

23 / 41

Design: Operating model scenario (climate and fishing)

24 / 41

Design: Operating model scenario (climate and fishing)

  • Recruitment variability in the operating model

  • Specify uncertainty in assessment inputs using atlantisom

sardinerec scale 100%

24 / 41

Climate impacts in the operating model

sardine

Hodgson, E. E., Kaplan, I. C., Marshall, K. N., Leonard, J., Essington, T. E., Busch, D. S., Fulton, E. A., et al. 2018. Consequences of spatially variable ocean acidification in the California Current: Lower pH drives strongest declines in benthic species in southern regions while greatest economic impacts occur in northern regions. Ecological Modelling, 383: 106–117.

Marshall, K. N., Kaplan, I. C., Hodgson, E. E., Hermann, A., Busch, D. S., McElhany, P., Essington, T. E., et al. 2017. Risks of ocean acidification in the California Current food web and fisheries: ecosystem model projections. Global Change Biology, 23: 1525–1539.

25 / 41

Climate impacts in the operating model

hake

Hodgson, E. E., Kaplan, I. C., Marshall, K. N., Leonard, J., Essington, T. E., Busch, D. S., Fulton, E. A., et al. 2018. Consequences of spatially variable ocean acidification in the California Current: Lower pH drives strongest declines in benthic species in southern regions while greatest economic impacts occur in northern regions. Ecological Modelling, 383: 106–117.

Marshall, K. N., Kaplan, I. C., Hodgson, E. E., Hermann, A., Busch, D. S., McElhany, P., Essington, T. E., et al. 2017. Risks of ocean acidification in the California Current food web and fisheries: ecosystem model projections. Global Change Biology, 23: 1525–1539.

26 / 41

Climate + cumulative impacts in the operating model

guild

27 / 41

Stock assessment uncertainty

  • Focus on climate impacts to growth and natural mortality (productivity)
  • Full factorial design over common stock assessment assumptions

    • Growth:

      1. constant growth parameters
      2. regime shifts in growth parameters (Stawitz et al. 2019)
      3. empirical weight-at-age (Kuriyama et al. 2016)
    • Natural mortality:

      1. fixed at an “uninformed” constant value of 0.2
      2. fixed at a constant value that reflects the true average value (over time) from the OM
      3. establishing regimes by fixing at the true average values from the OM over specified time blocks
    • Also, an equally weighted ensemble of the 9 estimation models

  • Stock synthesis framework initially, but extend to other assessment models, generalize, and learn from Norwegian data and assessment framework

28 / 41

Experimental design

29 / 41

Make atlantis output into assessment model input

Example workflows:

  1. Get true biomass, abundance, age composition, length composition, weight at age, fishery catch, fishery catch at age, fishery length composition, and fishery weight age age for a "sardine-like species": https://sgaichas.github.io/poseidon-dev/FullSardineTruthEx.html

  2. Format these outputs and get other life history parameters for input into a stock assessment model (Stock Synthesis, using r4ss): https://sgaichas.github.io/poseidon-dev/CreateStockSynthesis.html

  3. Get true and observed input data, format inputs, and run the assessment model: https://sgaichas.github.io/poseidon-dev/SardinesHakeatlantisom2SStest.html

  4. In progress: compare assessment results with truth: https://sgaichas.github.io/poseidon-dev/SkillAssessInit.html

30 / 41

What can we do so far?

Survey census test NOBA

True length composition NOBA

Standard survey test CCA

Survey length composition CCA

31 / 41

A "sardine" assessment

Need: assessment model data inputs and life history parameters

(model based on actual Sardine assessment in Stock Synthesis 3)

Data:

  • survey biomass index
  • survey length composition
  • survey age composition (conditional catch at age)
  • fishery catch (tons)
  • fishery length composition
  • fishery age composition

Parameters:

  • natural mortality (from total mortality)
  • growth curve (from survey length at age)
  • maturity at age (true)
  • unfished recruitment and steepness (true)
  • weight-length curve (true)
32 / 41

A "sardine" assessment: setup

  • California Current Atlantis run with and without climate signal
  • Input data generated (e.g. sardine survey, below in green)
  • Parameters derived; simpler recruitment distribution

33 / 41

A "sardine" assessment: fits to data

surveyfit lenfit

caafit1 caafit2

34 / 41

A "sardine" assessment: skill? (proof of concept)

Biomass Fishing mortality

Recruitment

Key: True SS3 estimate

35 / 41

Full disclosure!

Still working on:

  1. Functions for older Atlantis codebases (i.e., CCA model)

    1. Splitting aggregate age groups into true ages

    2. Interpolating aggregate age groups weight at age for true ages

    3. Fishery catch weight by area

  2. Wrapper functions to generate data in fewer steps

  3. Automated skill assessment functions

  4. Inputs for models other than Stock Synthesis

workinprogress scale 100%

36 / 41

Specify uncertainty in assessment "data": What Would Poseidon Do?

What level of uncertainty is appropriate to carry through these analyses?

  1. Biological:

    1. appropriate sigma-R?
  2. Survey specification:

    1. timing and spatial coverage?

    2. which species are captured?

    3. species-specific survey efficiency ("q")?

    4. selectivity at age for each species?

  1. Survey uncertainty:

    1. additional observation error (survey cv for index)?

    2. effective sample size for biological samples?

  2. Fishery uncertainty:

    1. additional observation error (catch cv for total)?

    2. catch sampled for length/age in all areas?

    3. effective sample size for biological samples?

37 / 41

P.S. What else could we test?

xkcd_ensemble_model_2x.png

38 / 41

Questions?

Tusen Takk til Havforskningsinstituttet!

40 / 41
41 / 41

Summer Vacation

2 / 41

Greece, Crete, near the cave of Polypheomos

Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
Esc Back to slideshow