Role of Ecosystem reporting in MAFMC EAFM
Report structure
Overview results for Mid-Atlantic 2019
EAFM risk assessment update
Notable improvements: open-source data and technical documentation
The IEA Loop1
"So what?" --John Boreman, September 2016
Clear linkage of ecosystem indicators with management objectives
Synthesis across indicators for big picture
Objectives related to human-well being placed first in report
Short (< 30 pages), non-technical (but rigorous) text
Emphasis on reproducibility
In 2016, we began taking steps to address these common critiques of the ESR model
2016 EAFM Policy Guidance document; revised 20191
MAFMC EAFM framework2
2017 Inital EAFM risk assessment completed; revised and published 20183
SOE indicators to be used for annual risk assessment updates
[1] http://www.mafmc.org/s/EAFM-Doc-Revised-2019-02-08.pdf
[2] https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2016.00105/full
[3] https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00442/full
Human dimensions
Protected species
Fish and invertebrates (managed and otherwise)
Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity
Objective Categories | Indicators |
---|---|
Seafood Production | Landings by feeding guild |
Profits | Revenue by feeding guild |
Recreation | Number of anglers and trips; recreational catch |
Stability | Diversity indices (fishery and species) |
Social & Cultural | Commercial and recreational reliance |
Biomass | Biomass or abundance by feeding guild from surveys |
Productivity | Condition and recruitment of managed species |
Trophic structure | Relative biomass of feeding guilds, primary productivity |
Habitat | Estuarine and offshore habitat conditions |
Status (short-term) and trend (long-term) of components are measured as indicators and plotted in a standardized way
Indicators are selected to
Be broadly informative about a component in a management context1-3
Minimize redundancy of information
Be responsive to ecosystem change
[1] Rice J. C.Rochet M. J. "A framework for selecting a suite of indicators for fisheries management." ICES Journal of Marine Science 62 (2005): 516–527.
[2] Link J. 2010. Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management: Confronting Tradeoffs . Cambridge University Press, New York.
[3] Zador, Stephani G., et al. "Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: the value of qualitative assessments." ICES Journal of Marine Science 74.1 (2017): 421-430.
Indicators
Guild | MAFMC | Joint | NEFMC | State or Other |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apex Predator | NA | NA | NA | bluefin tuna, shark uncl, swordfish, yellowfin tuna |
Piscivore | bluefish, summer flounder | goosefish, spiny dogfish | acadian redfish, atlantic cod, atlantic halibut, clearnose skate, little skate, offshore hake, pollock, red hake, silver hake, smooth skate, thorny skate, white hake, winter skate | fourspot flounder, john dory, sea raven, striped bass, weakfish, windowpane |
Planktivore | atlantic mackerel, butterfish, longfin squid, northern shortfin squid | NA | atlantic herring | alewife, american shad, blackbelly rosefish, blueback herring, cusk, longhorn sculpin, lumpfish, menhaden, northern sand lance, northern searobin, sculpin uncl |
Benthivore | black sea bass, scup, tilefish | NA | american plaice, barndoor skate, crab,red deepsea, haddock, ocean pout, rosette skate, winter flounder, witch flounder, yellowtail flounder | american lobster, atlantic wolffish, blue crab, cancer crab uncl, chain dogfish, cunner, jonah crab, lady crab, smooth dogfish, spider crab uncl, squid cuttlefish and octopod uncl, striped searobin, tautog |
Benthos | atlantic surfclam, ocean quahog | NA | sea scallop | blue mussel, channeled whelk, sea cucumber, sea urchin and sand dollar uncl, sea urchins, snails(conchs) |
Feeding guilds assigned based on NEFSC food habits data base
Simplified from existing guild structures1,2
[1] Garrison, Lance P, and Jason S Link. 2000. “Dietary guild structure of the fish community in the Northeast United States continental shelf ecosystem.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 202:231–40.
[2] Link, Jason S, Carolyn A Griswold, Elizabeth T Methratta, and Jessie Gunnard. 2006. Documentation for the energy modeling and analysis exercise (EMAX). US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic; Atmospheric Administration.
Because we focus on ecosystem context, we've aggregated species in most of our indicators up to the level of feeding guild, shown here.
These feeding guilds were derived from NEFSC food habits data and existing guilds identified in the literature
The purpose of this report is to synthesize available information relevant to fishery management in the Mid-Atlantic portion of the US Northeast Shelf. This 2019 report highlights where management interventions have proven successful to achieve ecological objectives, but also characterizes the considerable challenges for management posed by climate change and increasing trade-offs across conservation, fishing, and other human activities in this region. Finally, we describe combinations of ecological signals that present opportunities for further integrated research and possibly creative management solutions.
Evidence suggests that management limiting nutrient inputs has significantly improved water quality in Chesapeake Bay
Chesapeake Bay Water Quality
First indicator I'd like to talk about is a new water quality for Chesapeake Bay, which many resource species use as nursery habitat or are dependent upon (e.g. bluefish, striped bass, menhaden, black sea bass)
These data, which were provided by collaborators at the Chesapeake Bay Program, represent the percent of tidal waters in Chesapeake Bay meeting water quality standards for chlorophyll a, submerged aquatic vegetation, and dissolved oxygen. The increase in water quality for the Bay has been tied to management action limiting nutrient influx into the watershed, and improvments in dissolved oxygen and water clarity.
Current bycatch levels suggest that management actions have been effective in reducing harbor porpoise bycatch
The maps here show density estimates of the widely distributed harbor porpoise in the spring and fall months, as estimated by the Atlantic Marine Assessment Program for Protected Species.
The red line in the time series plot shows the potential biological removal. Above this line removals from the population will prevent the stock from reaching a stable population size.
2016 and 2017 estimates for bycacth are among the lowest values in the series, suggest that management actions have been effective in reducing harbor porpoise bycatch.
Plot shows the ratio of stock mortality (F) to stock mortality at maximum sustainable yield, where a number larger than one indicates the stock is experiencing unsustainable fishing pressure. On the x axis we have the ratio of estimated stock biomass to biomass at maximum sustainable yield.
Commercial fisheries landings: total and by guild
MAB:
Total managed and non-managed landings in MAB are declining, playing out as declines in most feeding guild landings
Increase in benthivore landings (scup, black sea bass, tilefish)
Commercial fisheries: Total revenue, with price and volume components
MAB:
MAB:
Overall decline in rec seafood harvest since 1980s
Increase in recreational effort (n anglers) since the mid 90s
Decreasing diversity indicators
Similar to NE, there's been a slight increase in recreational catch since the 90s in the Mid-Atlantic, along with a general increase in effort.
However, different from NE, there are significant downward trends in fleet effort diversity and diversity of catch. While a decline in fleet effort diversity is due to fewer party boats, we can't be sure why there's been a decline in diversity of catch, as South Atlantic FMC species are not tracked seperately.
Community engagement and reliance on commercial fisheries
MAB:
High social-ecological reliance on scallop commercial fisheries
Species considered moderately to highly at risk due to climate change (OA, temp)
Aquaculture in the MAB is also dominated by shellfish (oysters)
Virginia continues to lead the country in oyster production, with aquaculture in the region growing quickly. The time series looks flat compared to Virginia, but oyster aquaculture in New Jersey is also growing.
Recreational engagement and reliance
Downward trend in recreational catch diversity may threaten fishing community stability in Mid-Atlantic (caveat: should SAFMC species be separated?)
Engaged and reliant communities in New England could benefit from higher diversity of catch observed (see New England report)
North Atlantic right whales (NARW)
Evidence suggests that the level of interaction between NARWs, fixed gear (US and CAN) is contributing to the decline of the species
The North Atlantic right whale is among the most endangered whales in the world, with less than 450 individuals remaining and declining abundance trends. Evidence suggests that interactions with fisheries are contributing to the decline of the fisheries. Between 2017 and 2018, there were 20 known right whale mortality events, and more than half of these were the direct result of entanglement or vessel strike. Right whale distributions may also be changing with climate related distribution shifts of their main food source, Calanus finmarchicus.
Northeast US shelf is still among the fastest warming waters globally
Most northerly Gulf Stream north wall positions ever recorded 2014-2017
Advice for managing in the face of rapid, unprecedented ecosystem changes?
NE Shelf Long-term SST
Gulf Stream Index
SST Figure on left shows estimated time series of SST extending back to to 1850s. *7 out of 10 of the hottest years have been in the past decade
GSI The figure on the right shows that deviation from the mean latitude of the north wall of the gulf stream, showing anomalously high value for the past 5 years
These things are important for managers to know about because they directly influence stock distribution dynamics
The same is true for the Mid-Atlantic Bight
As I noted earlier, some species in the Mid-Atlantic could actually see range expansions due to warming ocean temperatures, including croaker and striped bass.
Traditional fisheries management is based around stable species distributions, but those distributions aren't static, and especially not in the context of changing ecosystem conditions
The NEFSC has run a bottom trawl survey since the early 1960s, and these figures highlight how distributions of managed species within feeding guilds have changed.
The decline in NEFMC species in the mid survey is driven mostly by ocean pout, which has seen proportional declines in the gulf of maine and georges bank survey
.footnote[ https://seanhardison.shinyapps.io/surv_app/
Bottom trawl surveys: Mid-Atlantic
NEFSC bottom trawl survey data paired with NEAMAP inshore bottom trawl data from the region
Opposing trends in piscivore biomass during the spring and fall seasons for the offshore survey
As temperature and ocean circulation indicators trend toward extremes, fishery management based on static stock areas will likely face continued changes in species distribution
For the Mid, we show offshore bottom trawl survey data paired with inshore bottom trawl data collected in the region by Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program.
There appear to be opposing trends in spring piscivore biomass between the two surveys, which could reflect higher prevalence of spiny dogfish offshore
We didn't include the data in this presentation, but we also recieved inshore survey data from the Maine/New Hampshire survey and Mass state survey, and we hope to take a deeper look over the next SOE cycle
[1] Bi H, Ji R, Liu H, Jo Y-H, Hare JA. Decadal Changes in Zooplankton of the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e87720. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087720
Primary production and copepod size structure
To assess the size structure of copepods in the region, we use the small-large index.
MAFMC Condition Factor
Looking at condition in aggregate across all managed stocks, we can see a clear decline in condition between 2000-2010
Recent improvement within past decade
Interestingly, the drop-off in condition around 2000 resembles a shift in zooplankton size-structure on the shelf, and this is a topic for future research
[1] Perretti, C., Fogarty, M., Friedland, K., Hare, J., Lucey, S., McBride, R., Miller, T., et al. 2017. Regime shifts in fish recruitment on the Northeast US Continental Shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 574: 1–11.
In the Mid, there seems to be a decline in productivity in recent years, due to changes in recruitment and survival.
In the past 5 years, strong productivity years for witch flounder, silver hake, and winter flounder have driven increases
Summer flounder fishing mortality (F) status has improved from high risk (F>Fmsy) to low risk (F<Fmsy) based on the new benchmark assessment
Updated commercial fleet diversity (fleet count and fleet diversity) have no long term trends, thus improving from moderate-high risk to low risk according to risk criteria for this element
No indicators for individual elements have changed enough to warrant increased risk rankings according to the Council risk critiera
But see caveats regarding analyses that were not updated
Recreational diversity indicators (fleet and species) to be considered
Chesapeake Bay water quality could be added to estuarine habitat element
Species level risk elements
Ecosystem level risk elements
Species and Sector level risk elements
Reporting the information is not enough
Managers appreciate the concise format, but back-end critical for describing collection, analyses, and processing
This workflows also ensures that there's no information lost between SOE cycles. We know exactly how a data set was analyzed and handled so that the data can be updated for next year's reports.
The New England and Mid-Atlantic SOEs made possible by (at least) 38 contributors from 8 intstitutions
Donald Anderson (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
Amani Bassyouni (Virginia Department of Health)
Lisa Calvo (Rutgers)
Matthew Camisa (MA Division of Marine Fisheries)
Patricia Clay
Lisa Colburn
Geret DePiper
Deb Duarte
Michael Fogarty
Paula Fratantoni
Kevin Friedland
Sarah Gaichas
James Gartland (Virginia Institute of Marine Science)
Heather Haas
Sean Hardison
Kimberly Hyde
Terry Joyce (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
John Kosik
Steve Kress (National Audubon Society)
Scott Large
Don Lyons (National Audubon Society)
Loren Kellogg
David Kulis (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
Sean Lucey
Chris Melrose
Ryan Morse
Kimberly Murray
Chris Orphanides
Richard Pace
Charles Perretti
Karl Roscher (Maryland Department of Natural Resources)
Vincent Saba
Laurel Smith
Mark Terceiro
John Walden
Harvey Walsh
Mark Wuenschel
Qian Zhang (Unversity of Maryland and US EPA Chesapeake Bay Program)
Feeding.guild | Description | Examples |
---|---|---|
Apex Predator | Top of food chain | Shark spp, swordfish |
Piscivore | Fish eaters | Atlantic cod, spiny dogfish |
Planktivore | Zooplankton eaters | Atlantic herring |
Benthivore | Feed on bottom | Lobster, black sea bass |
Benthos | Things that live on bottom | Sea scallop, urchins |
Townsend, D. W., Pettigrew, N. R., Thomas, M. A., Neary, M. G., McGillidcuddy, D. J., O'Donnell, J (2015), Water masses and nutrient sources to the Gulf of Maine, Journal of Marine Research, 73: 93-122.
Regional currents are major influencers of ocean temperatures in the NW Atlantic
The Gulf Stream is a reliable indicator of bottom water temps
An offshoot of the gulf stream is the warm slope water, which makes its way into gulf of maine through the northeast channel
Which brings us back to...
Over the past few years, we've seen a strong departure of the gulf stream north wall from it's mean latitude
With that comes a larger percentage of warm slope water entering into gulf of maine through the NE channel
Warmer waters affect vertical distribution of prey species
Role of Ecosystem reporting in MAFMC EAFM
Report structure
Overview results for Mid-Atlantic 2019
EAFM risk assessment update
Notable improvements: open-source data and technical documentation
The IEA Loop1
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |