Ecosystem Reporting and why it matters
Functional role of ecosystem reporting in the Northeast US
Report structure
Results from the 2019 Mid-Atlantic and New England reports
Strategies for open-source reporting
The IEA Loop1
Place-based management of all human ecosystem uses, or sectors1
"Cross-sectoral"
Scale of "place" defined by scale of impacts
[1] Agardy, Tundi, et al. "Taking steps toward marine and coastal ecosystem-based management: An introductory guide." (2011).
[2] Patrick, Wesley S., and Jason S. Link. "Myths that continue to impede progress in ecosystem-based fisheries management." Fisheries 40.4 (2015): 155-160.
Under EBM, the idea is that these "sectors" must be managed in an integrated fashion, where impacts of each sector on the ecosystem can be assessed and managed with respect to objectives
Ecosystem-based fishery management, or EBFM, is integrated management of a single sector, that is, fisheries.
EBFM considers trade-offs of management strategies on ecosystem components, within the fisheries sector
Here we describe the relationships between major ecosystem components on the northeast shelft
A framework for synthesis and analysis of natural, social, and economic factors that are relevant to established ecosystem management objectives1
[1] Levin, Phillip S., et al. "Integrated ecosystem assessments: developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean." PLoS biology 7.1 (2009): e1000014.
A framework for synthesis and analysis of natural, social, and economic factors that are relevant to established ecosystem management objectives1
[1] Levin, Phillip S., et al. "Integrated ecosystem assessments: developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean." PLoS biology 7.1 (2009): e1000014.
Before jumping in I'm going to start with some definitions of terms that you'll be hearing a lot of. The first is Integrated Ecosystem Assessmentor (IEA).
IEA is defined as a framework for the synthesis and analysis of relevant natural, social, and economic factors that are relevant to established management objectives.
IEA has been embraced on a nationwide scale by NOAA fisheries, and is a method for moving towards Ecosystem-Based Management for natural resources.
It's an iterative process, hence, "the loop", and starts with the establishment of management goals by fishery management councils.
Once objectives are defined, we develop indicators that allow us to quantify and report on the status and trends of ecosystem processes.
Next we work with management bodies to identify sources of risk in ecosystems that threaten the achievement of management goals, and then we use modeling techniques to evaluate how certain management strategies could propagate through the system.
Today I'm going to be talking to you about the ecosystem reporting phase of this process.
Ecosystem reporting provides a route for ecosystem information to enter the stock assessment process
All IEA regions in the US develop similar documents in varying guises
[1] Zador, Stephani G., et al. "Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: the value of qualitative assessments." ICES Journal of Marine Science 74.1 (2017): 421-430.
Ecosystem reporting provides a route for ecosystem information to enter the stock assessment process
All IEA regions in the US develop similar documents in varying guises
[1] Zador, Stephani G., et al. "Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: the value of qualitative assessments." ICES Journal of Marine Science 74.1 (2017): 421-430.
IEA Regions
Ecosystem Status Reports
Identify changes in ecosystem component status (short-term) and trend (long-term)
Identify potential for changes to affect management concerns
Highlight "red flags" and potential ecosystem state changes
This network diagram provides an example of how primary production and environmental drivers are linked to a pelagic fishery and protected species.
With ESRs, we want to describe these linkages and explain why they're important to managers.
Nested within the pelagic fishery node in this diagram are the societal benefits derived from that fishery, linking social and economic ecosystem components to the base of the food web and environment.
Why should managers care about an ecosystem perspective to resource management?
Why should managers care about an ecosystem perspective to resource management?
Well-informed management decisions rely upon knowledge of the ecosystem being managed
Why should managers care about an ecosystem perspective to resource management?
Well-informed management decisions rely upon knowledge of the ecosystem being managed
An ecosystem perspective is important for managing in the face of rapid, unprecedented ecosystem changes
NE Shelf Long-term SST
Gulf Stream Index
SST Figure on left shows estimated time series of SST extending back to to 1850s. *7 out of 10 of the hottest years have been in the past decade
GSI The figure on the right shows that deviation from the mean latitude of the north wall of the gulf stream, showing anomalously high value for the past 5 years
These things are important for managers to know about because they directly influence stock distribution dynamics
Fisheries yields are affected by ecosystem conditions1-3
Important ecosystem predictors of fisheries yield on global scale1:
[1] Friedland, Kevin D., et al. "Pathways between primary production and fisheries yields of large marine ecosystems." PLoS One 7.1 (2012): e28945.
[2] Frank, Kenneth T., et al. "Reconciling differences in trophic control in mid‐latitude marine ecosystems." Ecology Letters 9.10 (2006): 1096-1105.
[3] Ware, Daniel M., and Richard E. Thomson. "Bottom-up ecosystem trophic dynamics determine fish production in the Northeast Pacific." science 308.5726 (2005): 1280-1284.
The figure here shows the relationship between chlorophyll a production in 52 large marine ecosystems around the world with fisheries yield in those systems.
So we know that these relationships exist, but drawing actionable place-based management advice from this information is difficult, but in the works here at the Center.
ESRs developed by NEFSC since 2009
Considerable support for EAFM exists in Northeast
ESRs developed by NEFSC since 2009
Considerable support for EAFM exists in Northeast
Common refrain upon recieving ESR:
Biedron, Ingrid S., and Barbara A. Knuth. "Toward shared understandings of ecosystem-based fisheries management among fishery management councils and stakeholders in the US Mid-Atlantic and New England regions." Marine Policy 70 (2016): 40-48.
Council members are busy people!
Not all Council members have science background
"What does chlorophyll concentration tell us about fisheries yields?"
The disconnect inspired a new model, which we call State of the Ecosystem (SOE) reports
Question - We can't answer that question directly, but we can do a better job describing these ecosystem pathways
Addressing critiques to ESR model in SOE
Clear alignment of ecosystem components with management objectives
Objectives related to human-well being placed first in report
Non-technical text
Short (< 30 pages), but rigorous
Emphasis on reproducibility
In 2016, we began taking steps to address these common critiques of the ESR model
Status (short-term) and trend (long-term) of components are measured as indicators
Indicators are selected to
Be broadly informative about a component in a management context1-3
Minimize redundancy of information
Be responsive to ecosystem change
Status (short-term) and trend (long-term) of components are measured as indicators
Indicators are selected to
Be broadly informative about a component in a management context1-3
Minimize redundancy of information
Be responsive to ecosystem change
[1] Rice J. C.Rochet M. J. "A framework for selecting a suite of indicators for fisheries management." ICES Journal of Marine Science 62 (2005): 516–527.
[2] Link J. 2010. Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management: Confronting Tradeoffs . Cambridge University Press, New York.
[3] Zador, Stephani G., et al. "Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: the value of qualitative assessments." ICES Journal of Marine Science 74.1 (2017): 421-430.
Indicators
Human dimensions
Protected species
Fish and invertebrates (managed and otherwise)
Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity
Objective Categories | Indicators |
---|---|
Seafood Production | Landings by feeding guild |
Profits | Revenue by feeding guild |
Recreation | Number of anglers and trips; recreational catch |
Stability | Diversity indices (fishery and species) |
Social & Cultural | Commercial and recreational reliance |
Biomass | Biomass or abundance by feeding guild from surveys |
Productivity | Condition and recruitment of managed species |
Trophic structure | Relative biomass of feeding guilds, primary productivity |
Habitat | Estuarine and offshore habitat conditions |
Feeding.guild | Description | Examples |
---|---|---|
Apex Predator | Top of food chain | Shark spp, swordfish |
Piscivore | Fish eaters | Atlantic cod, spiny dogfish |
Planktivore | Zooplankton eaters | Atlantic herring |
Benthivore | Feed on bottom | Lobster, black sea bass |
Benthos | Things that live on bottom | Sea scallop, urchins |
Feeding guilds assigned based on NEFSC food habits data base
Simplified from existing guild structures1,2
[1] Garrison, Lance P, and Jason S Link. 2000. “Dietary guild structure of the fish community in the Northeast United States continental shelf ecosystem.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 202:231–40.
[2] Link, Jason S, Carolyn A Griswold, Elizabeth T Methratta, and Jessie Gunnard. 2006. Documentation for the energy modeling and analysis exercise (EMAX). US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic; Atmospheric Administration.
Because we focus on ecosystem context, we've aggregated species in most of our indicators up to the level of feeding guild, shown here.
These feeding guilds were derived from NEFSC food habits data and existing guilds identified in the literature
Commercial fisheries: Total landings
NE:
Significant decreases in NEFMC managed species in Gulf of Maine
Periodic signal in GB/MAB Benthos landings reflects rotational management of scallops
Commercial fisheries: Landings by feeding guild
Commercial fisheries: Landings by feeding guild
Commercial fisheries: Total landings
MAB:
Total managed and non-managed landings in MAB are declining, playing out as declines in most feeding guild landings
Increase in benthivore landings (scup, black sea bass, tilefish)
Total revenue of managed species also shows negative trend
Community engagement and reliance on commercial fisheries
NE:
Many social-ecological systems in New England are reliant on lobster, as in Gulf of Maine, or scallop, for Georges Bank. As these species are considered moderately to highly at risk due to climate change, the communities dependent on them are at risk as well.
Community engagement and reliance on commercial fisheries
MAB:
Similar story in MAB, where there is heavy reliance on scallops
Aquaculture in the MAB is also dominated by shellfish (oysters)
Virginia continues to lead the country in oyster production, with aquaculture in the region growing quickly. The time series looks flat compared to Virginia, but oyster aquaculture in New Jersey is also growing.
Recreational fishing
NE:
Positive long-term trend for diversity of catch in New England recreational fisheries
Overall decline in rec seafood harvest since 1980s
Increase in recreational effort (n anglers) since the mid 90s
While commercial fisheries have high specialization of catch, there's a positive long-term trend for recreational catch diversity in the recreational sector.
Updated Marine Recreational Information Program data shows that there's been an upswing in harvest since the mid-90s, although the trend overall is negative
This corresponds with an increase in recreational effort since the mid-90s
Recreational fishing
MAB:
Similar to NE, there's been a slight increase in rec seafood harvest and recreational effort
An opposite trend in recreational fleet effort diversity and diversity of catch
Similar to NE, there's been a slight increase in recreational catch since the 90s in the Mid-Atlantic, along with a general increase in effort.
However, different from NE, there are significant downward trends in fleet effort diversity and diversity of catch. While a decline in fleet effort diversity is due to fewer party boats, we can't be sure why there's been a decline in diversity of catch, as South Atlantic FMC species are not tracked seperately.
Recreational engagement and reliance
Downward trend in recreational catch diversity may threaten fishing community stability in Mid-Atlantic
Engaged and reliant communities in New England could benefit from higher diversity of catch
Image credit: Beth Josephson, NOAA Fisheries
Image credit: Beth Josephson, NOAA Fisheries
Image credit: Beth Josephson, NOAA Fisheries
North Atlantic right whales (NARW)
Strong consensus of population decline
North Atlantic right whales (NARW)
Strong consensus of population decline
Evidence suggests that the level of interaction between NARWs, lobster gear (US), and snow crab gear (CAN) is contributing to the decline of the species
The North Atlantic right whale is among the most endangered whales in the world, with less than 450 individuals remaining and declining abundance trends. Evidence suggests that interactions with fisheries are contributing to the decline of the fisheries. Between 2017 and 2018, there were 20 known right whale mortality events, and more than half of these were the direct result of entanglement or vessel strike. Right whale distributions may also be changing with climate related distribution shifts of their main food source, Calanus finmarchicus.
Harbor porpoise
The maps here show density estimates of the widely distributed harbor porpoise in the spring and fall months, as estimated by the Atlantic Marine Assessment Program for Protected Species.
The red line in the time series plot shows the potential biological removal. Above this line removals from the population will prevent the stock from reaching a stable population size.
2016 and 2017 estimates for bycacth are among the lowest values in the series, suggest that management actions have been effective in reducing harbor porpoise bycatch.
Common tern diet diversity
Warmer waters affect vertical distribution of prey species
Common tern diet diversity
Objective: Keep harvested species within population ranges where productivity is maximized over long-term
Stocks depicted here represent a subset of the full ecosystem
Objective: Keep harvested species within population ranges where productivity is maximized over long-term
Plot shows the ratio of stock mortality (F) to stock mortality at maximum sustainable yield, where a number larger than one indicates the stock is experiencing unsustainable fishing pressure. On the x axis we have the ratio of estimated stock biomass to biomass at maximum sustainable yield.
Changing distributions
Traditional fisheries management is based around stable species distributions, but those distributions aren't static, and especially not in the context of changing ecosystem conditions
The NEFSC has run a bottom trawl survey since the early 1960s, and these figures highlight how distributions of managed species within feeding guilds have changed.
The decline in NEFMC species in the mid survey is driven mostly by ocean pout, which has seen proportional declines in the gulf of maine and georges bank survey
Changing distributions
Bottom trawl surveys: New England
Bottom trawl surveys: Mid-Atlantic
NEFSC bottom trawl survey data paired with NEAMAP inshore bottom trawl data from the region
Opposing trends in piscivore biomass during the spring and fall seasons for the offshore survey.
For the Mid, we show offshore bottom trawl survey data paired with inshore bottom trawl data collected in the region by Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program.
There appear to be opposing trends in spring piscivore biomass between the two surveys, which could reflect higher prevalence of spiny dogfish offshore
We didn't include the data in this presentation, but we also recieved inshore survey data from the Maine/New Hampshire survey and Mass state survey, and we hope to take a deeper look over the next SOE cycle
Fish condition
NEFMC Condition Factor
Looking at condition in aggregate across all managed stocks, we can see a clear decline in condition between 2000-2010
Recent improvement within past decade
Interestingly, the drop-off in condition around 2000 resembles a shift in zooplankton size-structure on the shelf, and this is a topic for future research
Fish productivity
The fish productivity indicator shown here is the small fish per large fish biomass anomaly
In the Mid, there seems to be a decline in productivity in recent years, due to changes in recruitment and survival.
In the past 5 years, strong productivity years for witch flounder, silver hake, and winter flounder have driven increases
Larval diversity The last thing I'll talk about from the fish and intertebrates section is our metric of larval diversity, which was derived from the NEFSC Ecosystem Monitoring cruises.
The diversity index tells us about the changing dominance of forage fish, hake, and haddock in the plankton
The most recent data we have for the Mid-Atlantic has shown the lowest larval estimates of larval diversity in the time series. As temperatures increase, there is a potential for a temporal mismatch of larvae with their zooplankton food sources, which could affect larval survival.
Indicators here provide information about:
Chesapeake Bay Water Quality
First indicator I'd like to talk about is a new water quality for Chesapeake Bay, which many resource species use as nursery habitat or are dependent upon (e.g. bluefish, striped bass, menhaden, black sea bass)
These data, which were provided by collaborators at the Chesapeake Bay Program, represent the percent of tidal waters in Chesapeake Bay meeting water quality standards for chlorophyll a, submerged aquatic vegetation, and dissolved oxygen. The increase in water quality for the Bay has been tied to management action limiting nutrient influx into the watershed.
Ocean temperature: New England
Warming oceans have implications for suitable fish habitat, which is predicted to decline for many NE species1
Kleisner, Kristin M., et al. "Marine species distribution shifts on the US Northeast Continental Shelf under continued ocean warming." Progress in Oceanography 153 (2017): 24-36.
These changes have implications for fish populations in the region that are already at the southern extent of their ranges, like Atlantic cod. Suitable habitat for these species is predicted to contract as waters continue to warm.
Ocean temperature: New England
Much the same for bottom temperatures in the region
Ocean temperature: Mid-Atlantic
The same is true for the Mid-Atlantic Bight
As I noted earlier, some species in the Mid-Atlantic could actually see range expansions due to warming ocean temperatures, including croaker and striped bass.
Ocean circulation
Townsend, D. W., Pettigrew, N. R., Thomas, M. A., Neary, M. G., McGillidcuddy, D. J., O'Donnell, J (2015), Water masses and nutrient sources to the Gulf of Maine, Journal of Marine Research, 73: 93-122.
Regional currents are major influencers of ocean temperatures in the NW Atlantic
The Gulf Stream is a reliable indicator of bottom water temps
An offshoot of the gulf stream is the warm slope water, which makes its way into gulf of maine through the northeast channel
Ocean circulation
Which brings us back to...
Over the past few years, we've seen a strong departure of the gulf stream north wall from it's mean latitude
With that comes a larger percentage of warm slope water entering into gulf of maine through the NE channel
Primary production
Primary production and copepod size structure
To assess the size structure of copepods in the region, we use the small-large index.
Zooplankton abundance
[1] Bi H, Ji R, Liu H, Jo Y-H, Hare JA. Decadal Changes in Zooplankton of the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e87720. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087720
Even though the NE is "data rich", there are large gaps in our understanding of the system
Changes in climate dynamics affect all nodes of NES network in different ways, but all have implications for human-ecosystem interactions and community well-being
Even though the NE is "data rich", there are large gaps in our understanding of the system
Changes in climate dynamics affect all nodes of NES network in different ways, but all have implications for human-ecosystem interactions and community well-being
Making managers aware of the trends in ecosystem components is important for integrated and sustainable management strategies of the the fisheries sector (EBFM)
Reporting the information is not enough
Managers appreciate the concise format, but back-end critical for describing collection, analyses, and processing
This workflows also ensures that there's no information lost between SOE cycles. We know exactly how a data set was analyzed and handled so that the data can be updated for next year's reports.
The New England and Mid-Atlantic SOEs made possible by (at least) 38 contributors from 8 intstitutions
Donald Anderson (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
Amani Bassyouni (Virginia Department of Health)
Lisa Calvo (Rutgers)
Matthew Camisa (MA Division of Marine Fisheries)
Patricia Clay
Lisa Colburn
Geret DePiper
Deb Duarte
Michael Fogarty
Paula Fratantoni
Kevin Friedland
Sarah Gaichas
James Gartland (Virginia Institute of Marine Science)
Heather Haas
Sean Hardison
Kimberly Hyde
Terry Joyce (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
John Kosik
Steve Kress (National Audubon Society)
Scott Large
Don Lyons (National Audubon Society)
Loren Kellogg
David Kulis (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
Sean Lucey
Chris Melrose
Ryan Morse
Kimberly Murray
Chris Orphanides
Richard Pace
Charles Perretti
Karl Roscher (Maryland Department of Natural Resources)
Vincent Saba
Laurel Smith
Mark Terceiro
John Walden
Harvey Walsh
Mark Wuenschel
Qian Zhang (Unversity of Maryland and US EPA Chesapeake Bay Program)
Guild | MAFMC | Joint | NEFMC | State or Other |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apex Predator | NA | NA | NA | bluefin tuna, shark uncl, swordfish, yellowfin tuna |
Piscivore | bluefish, summer flounder | goosefish, spiny dogfish | acadian redfish, atlantic cod, atlantic halibut, clearnose skate, little skate, offshore hake, pollock, red hake, silver hake, smooth skate, thorny skate, white hake, winter skate | fourspot flounder, john dory, sea raven, striped bass, weakfish, windowpane |
Planktivore | atlantic mackerel, butterfish, longfin squid, northern shortfin squid | NA | atlantic herring | alewife, american shad, blackbelly rosefish, blueback herring, cusk, longhorn sculpin, lumpfish, menhaden, northern sand lance, northern searobin, sculpin uncl |
Benthivore | black sea bass, scup, tilefish | NA | american plaice, barndoor skate, crab,red deepsea, haddock, ocean pout, rosette skate, winter flounder, witch flounder, yellowtail flounder | american lobster, atlantic wolffish, blue crab, cancer crab uncl, chain dogfish, cunner, jonah crab, lady crab, smooth dogfish, spider crab uncl, squid cuttlefish and octopod uncl, striped searobin, tautog |
Benthos | atlantic surfclam, ocean quahog | NA | sea scallop | blue mussel, channeled whelk, sea cucumber, sea urchin and sand dollar uncl, sea urchins, snails(conchs) |
Ecosystem Reporting and why it matters
Functional role of ecosystem reporting in the Northeast US
Report structure
Results from the 2019 Mid-Atlantic and New England reports
Strategies for open-source reporting
The IEA Loop1
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |