+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
Notes for next slide

State of the Ecosystem:

Sean Hardison
Ecosystem Dynamics and Assessment
Integrated Statistics and Northeast Fisheries Science Center

1 / 53

Today's seminar

  • Ecosystem Reporting and why it matters

  • Functional role of ecosystem reporting in the Northeast US

  • Report structure

  • Results from the 2019 Mid-Atlantic and New England reports

  • Strategies for open-source reporting

The IEA Loop1 iea-loop

2 / 53

Ecosystem-Based Management

  • Place-based management of all human ecosystem uses, or sectors1

    • "Cross-sectoral"

    • Scale of "place" defined by scale of impacts

[1] Agardy, Tundi, et al. "Taking steps toward marine and coastal ecosystem-based management: An introductory guide." (2011).

[2] Patrick, Wesley S., and Jason S. Link. "Myths that continue to impede progress in ecosystem-based fisheries management." Fisheries 40.4 (2015): 155-160.

Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management

  • Integrated management of a single-sector (i.e. fisheries)
  • Considers trade-offs of management strategies on ecosystem components2

3 / 53

Under EBM, the idea is that these "sectors" must be managed in an integrated fashion, where impacts of each sector on the ecosystem can be assessed and managed with respect to objectives

Ecosystem-based fishery management, or EBFM, is integrated management of a single sector, that is, fisheries.

EBFM considers trade-offs of management strategies on ecosystem components, within the fisheries sector

Ecosystem Components

4 / 53

Here we describe the relationships between major ecosystem components on the northeast shelft

Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA)

A framework for synthesis and analysis of natural, social, and economic factors that are relevant to established ecosystem management objectives1

[1] Levin, Phillip S., et al. "Integrated ecosystem assessments: developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean." PLoS biology 7.1 (2009): e1000014.

5 / 53

Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA)

A framework for synthesis and analysis of natural, social, and economic factors that are relevant to established ecosystem management objectives1

[1] Levin, Phillip S., et al. "Integrated ecosystem assessments: developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean." PLoS biology 7.1 (2009): e1000014.

iea-loop-explanations The IEA Loop
5 / 53

Before jumping in I'm going to start with some definitions of terms that you'll be hearing a lot of. The first is Integrated Ecosystem Assessmentor (IEA).

IEA is defined as a framework for the synthesis and analysis of relevant natural, social, and economic factors that are relevant to established management objectives.

IEA has been embraced on a nationwide scale by NOAA fisheries, and is a method for moving towards Ecosystem-Based Management for natural resources.

It's an iterative process, hence, "the loop", and starts with the establishment of management goals by fishery management councils.

Once objectives are defined, we develop indicators that allow us to quantify and report on the status and trends of ecosystem processes.

Next we work with management bodies to identify sources of risk in ecosystems that threaten the achievement of management goals, and then we use modeling techniques to evaluate how certain management strategies could propagate through the system.

Today I'm going to be talking to you about the ecosystem reporting phase of this process.

Ecosystem Status Reporting (ESR)

Ecosystem reporting provides a route for ecosystem information to enter the stock assessment process

  • Well-developed example is AFSC; whose ESRs have long served as context for North Pacific FMC quota deliberations1

All IEA regions in the US develop similar documents in varying guises

[1] Zador, Stephani G., et al. "Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: the value of qualitative assessments." ICES Journal of Marine Science 74.1 (2017): 421-430.

6 / 53

Ecosystem Status Reporting (ESR)

Ecosystem reporting provides a route for ecosystem information to enter the stock assessment process

  • Well-developed example is AFSC; whose ESRs have long served as context for North Pacific FMC quota deliberations1

All IEA regions in the US develop similar documents in varying guises

[1] Zador, Stephani G., et al. "Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: the value of qualitative assessments." ICES Journal of Marine Science 74.1 (2017): 421-430.

IEA Regions

Ecosystem Status Reports

6 / 53

Goals of ESR:

  • Identify changes in ecosystem component status (short-term) and trend (long-term)

  • Identify potential for changes to affect management concerns

  • Highlight "red flags" and potential ecosystem state changes

SOE-Network-Diagram

7 / 53

This network diagram provides an example of how primary production and environmental drivers are linked to a pelagic fishery and protected species.

With ESRs, we want to describe these linkages and explain why they're important to managers.

Nested within the pelagic fishery node in this diagram are the societal benefits derived from that fishery, linking social and economic ecosystem components to the base of the food web and environment.

ESRs in the Northeast US: Relevance to management

Why should managers care about an ecosystem perspective to resource management?

8 / 53

ESRs in the Northeast US: Relevance to management

Why should managers care about an ecosystem perspective to resource management?

Well-informed management decisions rely upon knowledge of the ecosystem being managed

8 / 53

ESRs in the Northeast US: Relevance to management

Why should managers care about an ecosystem perspective to resource management?

Well-informed management decisions rely upon knowledge of the ecosystem being managed

An ecosystem perspective is important for managing in the face of rapid, unprecedented ecosystem changes

NE Shelf Long-term SST

Gulf Stream Index

8 / 53

SST Figure on left shows estimated time series of SST extending back to to 1850s. *7 out of 10 of the hottest years have been in the past decade

GSI The figure on the right shows that deviation from the mean latitude of the north wall of the gulf stream, showing anomalously high value for the past 5 years

These things are important for managers to know about because they directly influence stock distribution dynamics

ESRs in the Northeast US: Relevance to management

Fisheries yields are affected by ecosystem conditions1-3

Important ecosystem predictors of fisheries yield on global scale1:

  • Sea surface temperature (-)
  • Chlorophyll a (+)
  • Particle export ratio (particles leaving euphotic zone:primary production) (+)
  • Mesozooplankton productivity (+)

[1] Friedland, Kevin D., et al. "Pathways between primary production and fisheries yields of large marine ecosystems." PLoS One 7.1 (2012): e28945.

[2] Frank, Kenneth T., et al. "Reconciling differences in trophic control in mid‐latitude marine ecosystems." Ecology Letters 9.10 (2006): 1096-1105.

[3] Ware, Daniel M., and Richard E. Thomson. "Bottom-up ecosystem trophic dynamics determine fish production in the Northeast Pacific." science 308.5726 (2005): 1280-1284.

9 / 53

The figure here shows the relationship between chlorophyll a production in 52 large marine ecosystems around the world with fisheries yield in those systems.

So we know that these relationships exist, but drawing actionable place-based management advice from this information is difficult, but in the works here at the Center.

ESR in the Northeast US

ESRs developed by NEFSC since 2009

Considerable support for EAFM exists in Northeast

  • Most FMC members in the Northeast support transitioning from a single-species to a multi-species ecosystem approach (i.e. EBFM) to management1
10 / 53

ESR in the Northeast US

ESRs developed by NEFSC since 2009

Considerable support for EAFM exists in Northeast

  • Most FMC members in the Northeast support transitioning from a single-species to a multi-species ecosystem approach (i.e. EBFM) to management1

Common refrain upon recieving ESR:

"So what"?

Biedron, Ingrid S., and Barbara A. Knuth. "Toward shared understandings of ecosystem-based fisheries management among fishery management councils and stakeholders in the US Mid-Atlantic and New England regions." Marine Policy 70 (2016): 40-48.

10 / 53

Problems with ESR model:

  • Council members are busy people!

    • Long-documents with unfamiliar information unlikely to connect
  • Not all Council members have science background

  • "What does chlorophyll concentration tell us about fisheries yields?"

The disconnect inspired a new model, which we call State of the Ecosystem (SOE) reports

11 / 53

Question - We can't answer that question directly, but we can do a better job describing these ecosystem pathways

SOE Reporting: Ecosystem science for busy people

Addressing critiques to ESR model in SOE

  1. Clear alignment of ecosystem components with management objectives

  2. Objectives related to human-well being placed first in report

  3. Non-technical text

  4. Short (< 30 pages), but rigorous

  5. Emphasis on reproducibility

12 / 53

In 2016, we began taking steps to address these common critiques of the ESR model

SOE reporting: Quantifying change

Status (short-term) and trend (long-term) of components are measured as indicators

Indicators are selected to

  1. Be broadly informative about a component in a management context1-3

  2. Minimize redundancy of information

  3. Be responsive to ecosystem change

13 / 53

SOE reporting: Quantifying change

Status (short-term) and trend (long-term) of components are measured as indicators

Indicators are selected to

  1. Be broadly informative about a component in a management context1-3

  2. Minimize redundancy of information

  3. Be responsive to ecosystem change

[1] Rice J. C.Rochet M. J. "A framework for selecting a suite of indicators for fisheries management." ICES Journal of Marine Science 62 (2005): 516–527.

[2] Link J. 2010. Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management: Confronting Tradeoffs . Cambridge University Press, New York.

[3] Zador, Stephani G., et al. "Ecosystem considerations in Alaska: the value of qualitative assessments." ICES Journal of Marine Science 74.1 (2017): 421-430.

13 / 53

SOE reporting: Indicator spatial scales

epus

14 / 53

Indicators

State of the Ecosystem 2019: Structure

Report Structure

  1. Human dimensions

  2. Protected species

  3. Fish and invertebrates (managed and otherwise)

  4. Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Ecosystem-scale objectives and indicators on the Northeast US shelf
Objective Categories Indicators
Seafood Production Landings by feeding guild
Profits Revenue by feeding guild
Recreation Number of anglers and trips; recreational catch
Stability Diversity indices (fishery and species)
Social & Cultural Commercial and recreational reliance
Biomass Biomass or abundance by feeding guild from surveys
Productivity Condition and recruitment of managed species
Trophic structure Relative biomass of feeding guilds, primary productivity
Habitat Estuarine and offshore habitat conditions
15 / 53

SOE 2019: Feeding guilds

Feeding.guild Description Examples
Apex Predator Top of food chain Shark spp, swordfish
Piscivore Fish eaters Atlantic cod, spiny dogfish
Planktivore Zooplankton eaters Atlantic herring
Benthivore Feed on bottom Lobster, black sea bass
Benthos Things that live on bottom Sea scallop, urchins
  • Feeding guilds assigned based on NEFSC food habits data base

    • Food habits change with age and size, so guilds assigned based on most common size class
  • Simplified from existing guild structures1,2

[1] Garrison, Lance P, and Jason S Link. 2000. “Dietary guild structure of the fish community in the Northeast United States continental shelf ecosystem.” Marine Ecology Progress Series 202:231–40.

[2] Link, Jason S, Carolyn A Griswold, Elizabeth T Methratta, and Jessie Gunnard. 2006. Documentation for the energy modeling and analysis exercise (EMAX). US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic; Atmospheric Administration.

16 / 53

Because we focus on ecosystem context, we've aggregated species in most of our indicators up to the level of feeding guild, shown here.

These feeding guilds were derived from NEFSC food habits data and existing guilds identified in the literature

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Commercial fisheries: Total landings

NE:

  • Significant decreases in NEFMC managed species in Gulf of Maine

  • Periodic signal in GB/MAB Benthos landings reflects rotational management of scallops

17 / 53

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Commercial fisheries: Landings by feeding guild

  • Decrease in Atlantic herring driving divergence between managed/non-managed species

18 / 53

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Commercial fisheries: Landings by feeding guild

19 / 53

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Commercial fisheries: Total landings

MAB:

  • Total managed and non-managed landings in MAB are declining, playing out as declines in most feeding guild landings

  • Increase in benthivore landings (scup, black sea bass, tilefish)

  • Total revenue of managed species also shows negative trend

20 / 53

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Community engagement and reliance on commercial fisheries

NE:

  • High social-ecological reliance on scallop and lobster
  • Species considered moderately to highly at risk due to climate change (OA, temp)

21 / 53

Many social-ecological systems in New England are reliant on lobster, as in Gulf of Maine, or scallop, for Georges Bank. As these species are considered moderately to highly at risk due to climate change, the communities dependent on them are at risk as well.

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Community engagement and reliance on commercial fisheries

MAB:

  • Similar story in MAB, where there is heavy reliance on scallops

  • Aquaculture in the MAB is also dominated by shellfish (oysters)

22 / 53

Virginia continues to lead the country in oyster production, with aquaculture in the region growing quickly. The time series looks flat compared to Virginia, but oyster aquaculture in New Jersey is also growing.

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Recreational fishing

NE:

  • Positive long-term trend for diversity of catch in New England recreational fisheries

  • Overall decline in rec seafood harvest since 1980s

    • Trending upwards since mid-90s
  • Increase in recreational effort (n anglers) since the mid 90s

23 / 53

While commercial fisheries have high specialization of catch, there's a positive long-term trend for recreational catch diversity in the recreational sector.

Updated Marine Recreational Information Program data shows that there's been an upswing in harvest since the mid-90s, although the trend overall is negative

This corresponds with an increase in recreational effort since the mid-90s

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Recreational fishing

MAB:

  • Similar to NE, there's been a slight increase in rec seafood harvest and recreational effort

  • An opposite trend in recreational fleet effort diversity and diversity of catch

    • Decline in fleet effort diversity due to fewer party boats (24% of all trips down to 6%)

24 / 53

Similar to NE, there's been a slight increase in recreational catch since the 90s in the Mid-Atlantic, along with a general increase in effort.

However, different from NE, there are significant downward trends in fleet effort diversity and diversity of catch. While a decline in fleet effort diversity is due to fewer party boats, we can't be sure why there's been a decline in diversity of catch, as South Atlantic FMC species are not tracked seperately.

SOE 2019: Human dimensions

Recreational engagement and reliance

  • Downward trend in recreational catch diversity may threaten fishing community stability in Mid-Atlantic

  • Engaged and reliant communities in New England could benefit from higher diversity of catch

25 / 53

SOE 2019: Protected species

  • Protected species include marine mammals, endangered and threatened species, and migratory birds

Image credit: Beth Josephson, NOAA Fisheries

26 / 53

SOE 2019: Protected species

  • Protected species include marine mammals, endangered and threatened species, and migratory birds

Image credit: Beth Josephson, NOAA Fisheries

  • Fishery management objectives focus on reducing threats to protected species and conserving habitat
26 / 53
  • in 2018, there were 4 unusual mortality events for three large whale species and two seal species

SOE 2019: Protected species

  • Protected species include marine mammals, endangered and threatened species, and migratory birds

Image credit: Beth Josephson, NOAA Fisheries

  • Fishery management objectives focus on reducing threats to protected species and conserving habitat
26 / 53
  • in 2018, there were 4 unusual mortality events for three large whale species and two seal species

SOE 2019: Protected species

North Atlantic right whales (NARW)

  • Strong consensus of population decline

    • Diverging abundance trends between sexes, with higher female mortality rates
27 / 53

SOE 2019: Protected species

North Atlantic right whales (NARW)

  • Strong consensus of population decline

    • Diverging abundance trends between sexes, with higher female mortality rates
  • Evidence suggests that the level of interaction between NARWs, lobster gear (US), and snow crab gear (CAN) is contributing to the decline of the species

    • 20 NARW deaths in 2017 and 2018, >50% due to human interactions (5 vessel strike, 6 entanglement)

27 / 53

The North Atlantic right whale is among the most endangered whales in the world, with less than 450 individuals remaining and declining abundance trends. Evidence suggests that interactions with fisheries are contributing to the decline of the fisheries. Between 2017 and 2018, there were 20 known right whale mortality events, and more than half of these were the direct result of entanglement or vessel strike. Right whale distributions may also be changing with climate related distribution shifts of their main food source, Calanus finmarchicus.

SOE 2019: Protected species

Harbor porpoise

  • Current bycatch levels suggest that management actions have been effective in reducing harbor porpoise bycatch
28 / 53

The maps here show density estimates of the widely distributed harbor porpoise in the spring and fall months, as estimated by the Atlantic Marine Assessment Program for Protected Species.

The red line in the time series plot shows the potential biological removal. Above this line removals from the population will prevent the stock from reaching a stable population size.

2016 and 2017 estimates for bycacth are among the lowest values in the series, suggest that management actions have been effective in reducing harbor porpoise bycatch.

SOE 2019: Protected species

Common tern diet diversity

  • Warmer waters affect vertical distribution of prey species

    • Results in more generalist diet choices
  • High diet diversity in past decade may be the result of decreases in preferred prey type (hake, sandlance)

29 / 53

SOE 2019: Protected species

Common tern diet diversity

  • Warmer waters result in butterfish appearing in common tern diet
    • May cause starvation or require parents to increase foraging effort
  • High diet diversity in past decade may be the result of decreases in preferred prey type (hake, sandlance)
1990200020100.000.250.500.751.00
AmphipodButterfishEuphausiidHakeHerringOther InvertebratePollockSandlanceUnknown FishUnknown InvertebratePrey compositionTimeProportion of prey itemsPrey
30 / 53
  • Common tern breeding colonies are monitored in the southern GOM
  • Common tern sensitive to vertical distribution of prey

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Objective: Keep harvested species within population ranges where productivity is maximized over long-term

  • 4 stocks above F/Fmsy and below B/Bmsy
    • Southern NE Yellowtail, GOM Cod, CC-GOM Yellowtail, Southern GB/MAB red hake
31 / 53

Stocks depicted here represent a subset of the full ecosystem

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Objective: Keep harvested species within population ranges where productivity is maximized over long-term

  • No stock above F/Fmsy and below B/Bmsy
  • Mackerel currently seeing unsustainable fishing mortality
32 / 53

Plot shows the ratio of stock mortality (F) to stock mortality at maximum sustainable yield, where a number larger than one indicates the stock is experiencing unsustainable fishing pressure. On the x axis we have the ratio of estimated stock biomass to biomass at maximum sustainable yield.

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Changing distributions

  • Decline in proportion of NEFMC in MAB driven mostly by ocean pout
  • Increase in MAFMC species proportiongs in GOM/GB driven by mackerel
33 / 53

Traditional fisheries management is based around stable species distributions, but those distributions aren't static, and especially not in the context of changing ecosystem conditions

The NEFSC has run a bottom trawl survey since the early 1960s, and these figures highlight how distributions of managed species within feeding guilds have changed.

The decline in NEFMC species in the mid survey is driven mostly by ocean pout, which has seen proportional declines in the gulf of maine and georges bank survey

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Changing distributions

  • Increase in MAFMC species in GOM and GB driven by mackerel
34 / 53

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Bottom trawl surveys: New England

35 / 53
  • In Gulf of Maine, the survey data show long-term increases in the Fall survey for Piscivores, Planktivores, and Benthos species, and long-term increases in planktivore abundance in the spring.
  • In Georges Bank, the survey shows long-term increases for benthos and planktivore species in both fall and spring, and piscivores in the fall.
  • A recent decline in Georges Bank benthivore biomass is driven by a decline in haddock in the survey

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Bottom trawl surveys: Mid-Atlantic

  • NEFSC bottom trawl survey data paired with NEAMAP inshore bottom trawl data from the region

  • Opposing trends in piscivore biomass during the spring and fall seasons for the offshore survey.

36 / 53

For the Mid, we show offshore bottom trawl survey data paired with inshore bottom trawl data collected in the region by Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program.

There appear to be opposing trends in spring piscivore biomass between the two surveys, which could reflect higher prevalence of spiny dogfish offshore

We didn't include the data in this presentation, but we also recieved inshore survey data from the Maine/New Hampshire survey and Mass state survey, and we hope to take a deeper look over the next SOE cycle

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Fish condition

  • Fish condition is measured at the weight at a given length relative to the average
    • Condition, or "fatness", is a factor that influences fecundity

NEFMC Condition Factor

37 / 53

Looking at condition in aggregate across all managed stocks, we can see a clear decline in condition between 2000-2010

Recent improvement within past decade

Interestingly, the drop-off in condition around 2000 resembles a shift in zooplankton size-structure on the shelf, and this is a topic for future research

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Fish productivity

The fish productivity indicator shown here is the small fish per large fish biomass anomaly

38 / 53

In the Mid, there seems to be a decline in productivity in recent years, due to changes in recruitment and survival.

In the past 5 years, strong productivity years for witch flounder, silver hake, and winter flounder have driven increases

SOE 2019: Fish and invertebrates

Larval diversity The last thing I'll talk about from the fish and intertebrates section is our metric of larval diversity, which was derived from the NEFSC Ecosystem Monitoring cruises.

The diversity index tells us about the changing dominance of forage fish, hake, and haddock in the plankton

The most recent data we have for the Mid-Atlantic has shown the lowest larval estimates of larval diversity in the time series. As temperatures increase, there is a potential for a temporal mismatch of larvae with their zooplankton food sources, which could affect larval survival.

39 / 53

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Indicators here provide information about:

  • Changing conditions encountered by managed species in different seasons and across habitats, which likely influences their distributions

Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

40 / 53

First indicator I'd like to talk about is a new water quality for Chesapeake Bay, which many resource species use as nursery habitat or are dependent upon (e.g. bluefish, striped bass, menhaden, black sea bass)

These data, which were provided by collaborators at the Chesapeake Bay Program, represent the percent of tidal waters in Chesapeake Bay meeting water quality standards for chlorophyll a, submerged aquatic vegetation, and dissolved oxygen. The increase in water quality for the Bay has been tied to management action limiting nutrient influx into the watershed.

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Ocean temperature: New England

Warming oceans have implications for suitable fish habitat, which is predicted to decline for many NE species1

Kleisner, Kristin M., et al. "Marine species distribution shifts on the US Northeast Continental Shelf under continued ocean warming." Progress in Oceanography 153 (2017): 24-36.

  • Gulf of Maine summer SSTs were the highest on record in 2018 (~3°C > long-term mean)
41 / 53

These changes have implications for fish populations in the region that are already at the southern extent of their ranges, like Atlantic cod. Suitable habitat for these species is predicted to contract as waters continue to warm.

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Ocean temperature: New England

Much the same for bottom temperatures in the region

42 / 53

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Ocean temperature: Mid-Atlantic

43 / 53

The same is true for the Mid-Atlantic Bight

  • Mid-Atlantic summer SSTs were 3rd highest on record

As I noted earlier, some species in the Mid-Atlantic could actually see range expansions due to warming ocean temperatures, including croaker and striped bass.

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Ocean circulation

Townsend, D. W., Pettigrew, N. R., Thomas, M. A., Neary, M. G., McGillidcuddy, D. J., O'Donnell, J (2015), Water masses and nutrient sources to the Gulf of Maine, Journal of Marine Research, 73: 93-122.

44 / 53

Regional currents are major influencers of ocean temperatures in the NW Atlantic

The Gulf Stream is a reliable indicator of bottom water temps

An offshoot of the gulf stream is the warm slope water, which makes its way into gulf of maine through the northeast channel

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Ocean circulation

Which brings us back to...

45 / 53

Over the past few years, we've seen a strong departure of the gulf stream north wall from it's mean latitude

With that comes a larger percentage of warm slope water entering into gulf of maine through the NE channel

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Primary production

  • Summer PP is increasing in both New England and Mid-Atlantic

46 / 53
  • Driven by warmer temperatures and increased bacterial remineralization and nutrient recycling
  • Increasing primary production likely due to higher productivity of smaller phytoplankton

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Primary production and copepod size structure

  • Primary production may play a role in zooplankton size dynamics on the shelf

47 / 53

To assess the size structure of copepods in the region, we use the small-large index.

  • A measure of relative size composition of the dominant copepod taxa
  • A lower value means higher abundance of large copepods (Calanus)
  • Primary production may play a role in copepod size dynamics*

SOE 2019: Habitat quality and ecosystem productivity

Zooplankton abundance

  • Seasonal abundances of key zooplankton species
    • Opposing trends in Centropages in spring and fall, which corresponds to a shift in timing of their peak concentration from late fall to early spring1

[1] Bi H, Ji R, Liu H, Jo Y-H, Hare JA. Decadal Changes in Zooplankton of the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e87720. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087720

48 / 53

SOE 2019: Takeaways

  • Even though the NE is "data rich", there are large gaps in our understanding of the system
49 / 53

SOE 2019: Takeaways

  • Even though the NE is "data rich", there are large gaps in our understanding of the system

  • Changes in climate dynamics affect all nodes of NES network in different ways, but all have implications for human-ecosystem interactions and community well-being

49 / 53

SOE 2019: Takeaways

  • Even though the NE is "data rich", there are large gaps in our understanding of the system

  • Changes in climate dynamics affect all nodes of NES network in different ways, but all have implications for human-ecosystem interactions and community well-being

  • Making managers aware of the trends in ecosystem components is important for integrated and sustainable management strategies of the the fisheries sector (EBFM)

49 / 53

SOE 2019: Reproducibility and provenance

  • Reporting the information is not enough

  • Managers appreciate the concise format, but back-end critical for describing collection, analyses, and processing

soe-data-flow

50 / 53

This workflows also ensures that there's no information lost between SOE cycles. We know exactly how a data set was analyzed and handled so that the data can be updated for next year's reports.

Contributors - THANK YOU!

The New England and Mid-Atlantic SOEs made possible by (at least) 38 contributors from 8 intstitutions

Donald Anderson (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
Amani Bassyouni (Virginia Department of Health)
Lisa Calvo (Rutgers)
Matthew Camisa (MA Division of Marine Fisheries)
Patricia Clay
Lisa Colburn
Geret DePiper
Deb Duarte
Michael Fogarty
Paula Fratantoni
Kevin Friedland
Sarah Gaichas
James Gartland (Virginia Institute of Marine Science)
Heather Haas
Sean Hardison
Kimberly Hyde
Terry Joyce (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
John Kosik
Steve Kress (National Audubon Society)
Scott Large

Don Lyons (National Audubon Society)
Loren Kellogg
David Kulis (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute)
Sean Lucey
Chris Melrose
Ryan Morse
Kimberly Murray
Chris Orphanides
Richard Pace
Charles Perretti
Karl Roscher (Maryland Department of Natural Resources)
Vincent Saba
Laurel Smith
Mark Terceiro
John Walden
Harvey Walsh
Mark Wuenschel
Qian Zhang (Unversity of Maryland and US EPA Chesapeake Bay Program)

51 / 53

Species compositions by feeding guild

Feeding guilds and management bodies.
Guild MAFMC Joint NEFMC State or Other
Apex Predator NA NA NA bluefin tuna, shark uncl, swordfish, yellowfin tuna
Piscivore bluefish, summer flounder goosefish, spiny dogfish acadian redfish, atlantic cod, atlantic halibut, clearnose skate, little skate, offshore hake, pollock, red hake, silver hake, smooth skate, thorny skate, white hake, winter skate fourspot flounder, john dory, sea raven, striped bass, weakfish, windowpane
Planktivore atlantic mackerel, butterfish, longfin squid, northern shortfin squid NA atlantic herring alewife, american shad, blackbelly rosefish, blueback herring, cusk, longhorn sculpin, lumpfish, menhaden, northern sand lance, northern searobin, sculpin uncl
Benthivore black sea bass, scup, tilefish NA american plaice, barndoor skate, crab,red deepsea, haddock, ocean pout, rosette skate, winter flounder, witch flounder, yellowtail flounder american lobster, atlantic wolffish, blue crab, cancer crab uncl, chain dogfish, cunner, jonah crab, lady crab, smooth dogfish, spider crab uncl, squid cuttlefish and octopod uncl, striped searobin, tautog
Benthos atlantic surfclam, ocean quahog NA sea scallop blue mussel, channeled whelk, sea cucumber, sea urchin and sand dollar uncl, sea urchins, snails(conchs)
53 / 53

Today's seminar

  • Ecosystem Reporting and why it matters

  • Functional role of ecosystem reporting in the Northeast US

  • Report structure

  • Results from the 2019 Mid-Atlantic and New England reports

  • Strategies for open-source reporting

The IEA Loop1 iea-loop

2 / 53
Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
Esc Back to slideshow